On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:34:24AM +0000, Ng, Boon Khai wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > > Sent: Saturday, 18 January, 2025 1:57 AM > > To: Ng, Boon Khai <boon.khai...@intel.com> > > Cc: Uboot Open List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Chee, Tien Fong > > <tien.fong.c...@intel.com>; Hea, Kok Kiang <kok.kiang....@intel.com>; > > Maniyam, Dinesh <dinesh.mani...@intel.com>; Yuslaimi, Alif Zakuan > > <alif.zakuan.yusla...@intel.com>; Zamri, Muhammad Hazim Izzat > > <muhammad.hazim.izzat.za...@intel.com> > > Subject: Re: [XGMAC dt bindings v1 1/1] dt: net: add DWC XGMAC binding > > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 11:15:34AM +0800, Boon Khai Ng wrote: > > > > > The Synopsys DWC XGMAC is a configurable Ethernet MAC/DMA IP block > > > which supports multiple options for bus type, clocking and reset > > > structure, and feature list. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Boon Khai Ng <boon.khai...@intel.com> > > > --- > > > .../net/snps,dwc-xgmac-ethernet.txt | 67 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 > > > doc/device-tree-bindings/net/snps,dwc-xgmac-ethernet.txt > > > > Same comments as the first binding patch. > > Hi Tom, I didn't quite get the context, the previous comment in the first > binding patch > were " We need to just use the upstream binding here, thanks." > > Do you mean I can just use the doc/device-tree-bindings/net/stmmac.txt > as the binding for the xgmac driver?
To be clear, it means you should use the same bindings at the linux kernel, which we have in dts/upstream/ -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
