On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 09:56, Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> > > Essentially the only differences between u-boot-rockchip.bin and > u-boot-rockchip-spi.bin are the formatting of idbloader.img which is > handled by mkimage (via -T rkspi/rksd) and the offset at which U-Boot > proper is flashed, the content of the binaries are identical otherwise. > > This fixes some issues[1] where binman tries to find the symbols defined > in the proper binary to install them in an xPL binary. However, because > we use the binary for proper (on Aarch64) generated in simple-bin image > node and not simple-bin-spi image node, binman doesn't have access to > that symbol anymore. Therefore, let's depend entirely on binaries built > by simple-bin in simple-bin-spi so those issues do not arise anymore as > nothing is compiled essentially, just assembled. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/[email protected]/ > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm/dts/rockchip-u-boot.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
Tested-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> # chromebook-kevin Tested-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> # chromebook-bob
