On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 12:10:04PM +0100, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > On 3/15/25 12:58 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Hendrik, > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 5:09 PM Hendrik Donner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > In c9713c155127 the device tree was moved > > > from CONFIG_SPL to CONFIG_SPL_BUILD and later to CONFIG_XPL_BUILD, but > > > the CONFIG_xPL_BUILD defines are never set for device trees, breaking > > > the build. Move the guards back to CONFIG_SPL. > > > > Please provide details about the "breaking the build". Which target > > The nodes will simply never be added, because CONFIG_XPL_BUILD (or > CONFIG_SPL_BUILD) simply aren't passed to dtc. > > So essentially, this is equivalent to dead/noop code. > > > fails to build currently? > > > > After applying this series, the previous build failures return: > > > > Yes, it was never fixed, just silenced by never building it. > > See > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/[email protected]/
It sounds to me like imx8/9 and faking external blobs isn't being handled correctly at this time. Along with needing to make use of making use of CONFIG_BUILD_TARGET so that "make all" will build the right binary (when the right external blobs exist). -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
