Dear Asen Dimov, > Hi Reinhard, > > On 06/09/2011 02:00 PM, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > ... >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99665/ >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99666/ >>>> >>>> [PM9263] >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99662/ >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99668/ >>>> >>>> [PM9G45] >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99664/ >>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/99667/ >> Ah, and patches should be numbered 1/n .. n/n; 0/n is only >> for a descriptive summary. >> > should I repost them numbering with 1/n? After applying, the text within [] is gone anyway, so it is ok for me.
Unless someone mandates otherwise... Best Regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot