OK, I will try to find that Linux patch and see how it goes. And, first of all, I will suggest my manager to change the checkout-build-release process. I also agree that just release the binary we tested is a much better way.
Thank you guys. 2011/6/13 Jon Povey <jon.po...@racelogic.co.uk>: > u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de wrote: >> Our product is used in a safety-critical situation. We want to make >> sure that the product we released is exactly the one we tested in our >> labs. Because our product is released in a checkout-build-release >> process, it is impossible to just give out the binary file we tested. > > I am pretty sure I saw some patches for Linux within the last couple > of months that make this a config option for the kernel for the same > kind of reasons. Maybe good for inspiration. > > Sorry, but I can't remember exactly when, or if they got into mainline. > > Seems like a good option to have, though. > > -- > Jon Povey > jon.po...@racelogic.co.uk > > Racelogic is a limited company registered in England. Registered number > 2743719 . > Registered Office Unit 10, Swan Business Centre, Osier Way, Buckingham, > Bucks, MK18 1TB . > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission is intended by > Racelogic Ltd for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is > directed and may contain information that is confidential or privileged. If > you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete > it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender > of the error by reply email so that the sender's address records can be > corrected. The views expressed by the sender of this communication do not > necessarily represent those of Racelogic Ltd. Please note that Racelogic > reserves the right to monitor e-mail communications passing through its > network > > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
