Am 01.09.25 um 16:54 schrieb Tom Rini: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 08:52:32AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote: >> Am 01.09.25 um 07:03 schrieb Peng Fan: >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> Please pull mmc-power-next-2025-09-01 >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Update compatibles for PMICs used by exynos devices >>> Support system reset and reset status for pca9450 >>> Fix for pca9450 LDO5 registers and drop deprecated sd-vsel-gpios >>> Two minor fixes found by smatch >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> CI: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-mmc/-/pipelines/27536 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Peng >>> >>> The following changes since commit c9ffeefeb3efedd754e3ffa3440bfeb15cea00c3: >>> >>> test: Update logic for video test (2025-08-31 09:32:17 -0600) >>> >>> are available in the Git repository at: >>> >>> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-mmc.git >>> tags/mmc-power-next-2025-09-01 >>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 140562d3a2b447079499d773a7d21ec1728692cb: >>> >>> mmc: core: drop space before newline in trace printf (2025-09-01 10:33:10 >>> +0800) >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Andrew Goodbody (2): >>> power: regulator: tps65910: Cannot test unsigned for being negative >> >> The change above has unresolved review comments and IMHO it shouldn't be >> applied as is. In patchwork the status is correctly set to "Changes >> Requested", therefore I would expect it to not be included here. > > Yes, sorry Peng, I was just expecting a PR of power-related changes for > NXP (layerscape and iMX) related things, not everything that's > outstanding in Jaehoon's queue. I went through it over the weekend too > and marked that one as Changed Requested but applied the rest of the > series, for example.
As Andrew just pointed out to me my review comment on this patch was wrong. So the patch in fact should be fine as-is. Sorry for the noise.
