On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 12:48:29PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote: > > > On 9/26/25 18:31, Tom Rini wrote: > > The way that the NAND driver under DM_NAND_ATMEL is probed is by the > > dummy memory driver controlled by ATMEL_EBI. Rather than require that > > for NAND to work both be enabled, make NAND select ATMEL_EBI and do not > > prompt for ATMEL_EBI as it only triggers the probe for NAND. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]> > > --- > > Cc: Eugen Hristev <[email protected]> > > Cc: Dario Binacchi <[email protected]> > > Cc: Michael Trimarchi <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/memory/Kconfig | 2 +- > > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/memory/Kconfig b/drivers/memory/Kconfig > > index eaee739c6aab..591d9d9c6569 100644 > > --- a/drivers/memory/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/memory/Kconfig > > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ config MEMORY > > For now this uclass has no methods yet. > > > > config ATMEL_EBI > > - bool "Support for Atmel EBI" > > + bool > > help > > Driver for Atmel EBI controller. This is a dummy > > driver. Doesn't provide an access to EBI controller. Select > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig > > index aa4bb2a0595c..f083113486ed 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig > > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ config SYS_NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE > > config DM_NAND_ATMEL > > bool "Support Atmel NAND controller with DM support" > > depends on ARCH_AT91 > > Which branch is this patch based on ? > I have a conflict because this line ^^ is missing in master ("depends on > ARCH_AT91") > Is there another patch for that ?
Ugh, yes, sorry, this patch depends on: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/ -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
