On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 08:15:48AM -0600, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:50:09AM +0200, Kory Maincent wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Oct 2025 10:48:37 -0600 > > Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 02:05:51PM +0100, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Kory, > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 at 14:32, Kory Maincent (TI.com) > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This series converts the extension board framework to use UCLASS as > > > > > requested by Simon Glass, then adds extension support to pxe_utils > > > > > and bootmeth_efi (not tested) to enable extension boards devicetree > > > > > load > > > > > in the standard boot process. > > > > > > > > > > I can't test the imx8 extension scan enabled by the > > > > > imx8mm-cl-iot-gate_defconfig as I don't have this board. > > > > > I also can't test the efi bootmeth change as I don't have such board. > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can test this with sandbox, using one of the bootmeth tests, > > > > perhaps. Let me know if you need help with this. > > > > > > But the question is, does the real hardware platform work before/after > > > this, not does the sandbox test still work before/after this. > > > > It seems the bootlflow scan is not working on the sandbox on next branch. > > Is this issue known? > > Is it fine on master? The next branch will be out of date until it > re-opens with -rc2 being released (2 weeks from today).
... out of sync local calendar, 3 weeks from today, not 2. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
