Hi, Marek,
This is what I plan to do, please advise if you are ok with it.
1.
reformat the table to follow this format.
{
INFO("gd25q32", 0xc84016, 0, 64 * 1024, 64,
SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ |
SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_HAS_TB)
},
1.
Re-arrange the order of the table based on the ID, so that I can group the part
#s by product family.
2.
I have a few more part numbers to add to the table, can I add them with this
update?
3.
Do I submit as a new patch?
Regards,
Victor
________________________________
From: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 20:40
To: Vlim <[email protected]>; Marek Vasut <[email protected]>;
[email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: Jagan Teki <[email protected]>; Takahiro Kuwano
<[email protected]>; Tom Rini <[email protected]>; Tudor Ambarus
<[email protected]>; Venkatesh Yadav Abbarapu
<[email protected]>; Vignesh R <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor-ids: Reformat the table
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is
important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
此为外部邮件，谨防钓鱼邮件，请注意邮件是否涉及敏感信息
This is an external email, beware of phishing emails. Please pay close
attention to whether the email contains sensitive information
On 10/28/25 3:03 AM, Vlim wrote:
> Thanks, Marek,
Hello Victor,
> Can I follow this format.
> Should I change all part numbers so that they are all with the same format?
What kind of change do you have in mind ?
I think the gigadevice part numbers look very much reasonable already.
> Also, is it a good idea if I change the order of the part number so that I
> can group part #s by product family?
Sure, the table is not sorted exactly alphabetically. If sorting by
product family makes more sense for GD, let's do that.
[...]
