On 11/4/25 4:56 AM, Alice Guo (OSS) wrote:
Hello Alice,
I tested PATCH v3 on i.MX95, and it works as expected. However, I noticed that
PATCH v3 increases runtime memory usage. I'm not sure whether this is a concern
we need to address, so I want to discuss it with you. Here is the change I made
based on PATCH v2:
static int scmi_clk_gate(struct clk *clk, int enable)
{
- struct scmi_clock_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(clk->dev->parent);
+ struct scmi_clock_priv *priv = clk->dev->parent_priv_;
struct scmi_clk_state_in_v1 in_v1 = {
.clock_id = clk_get_id(clk),
.attributes = enable,
@@ -331,6 +332,7 @@ static int scmi_clk_probe(struct udevice *dev)
}
dev_clk_dm(dev, i, &clk_scmi->clk);
+ dev_set_parent_priv(clk_scmi->clk.dev, priv);
if (CLK_HAS_RESTRICTIONS(attributes)) {
u32 perm;
This is a VERY nice solution, thank you for bringing this up.
I will use that for V4.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
