On 12/11/25 9:31 AM, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
From: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
With commit 3547e315c188 ("clk: scmi: Defer issue of SCMI_CLOCK_ATTRIBUTES"),
the SCMI clock names might be defered. However the SCMI clock may be
input to other clock controllers, such as clk-imx95-blkctrl.
Without the clock names being resolved, there will be error:
clk_register: failed to get hsiopll device (parent of hsio_blk_ctl_clk)
So export this API for users.
Shouldn't the relationship between clock be described in DT using
"clock" property and phandles/cells ? You shouldn't have to resolve
clock by names.
