> On 09.01.26 23:17, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi Hal, > > Your mail didn't make it to the mailing list. It doesn't appear on the > archive at > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2026-January/thread.html and the > moderators of the mailing list cannot find your mail anywhere in the system > (in spams or filtered mails). > > Can you consider subscribing to the list (here > https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u- > boot, Subscribing to U-Boot). You can disable receiving all mails in the > Options > (Mail delivery: Disabled) if you don't want to receive all mails (which I > understand :) ). > > Can you please resend your mail once that is done so it makes it to the > mailing > list archive and I can point at this in the commit log for the patch fixing > the > license? Alternatively, you can just send the patch fixing the license > yourself > (but again, it'll need to make it to the mailing list :) ).
I subscribed to the list and sent a patch [1] to fix it. Thank you for reporting this issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Best regards, Hal > > On 1/9/26 7:11 AM, Hal Feng wrote: > >> On 08.01.26 23:59, Quentin Schulz wrote: > >> On 1/8/26 4:47 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: > >>> Hi Oliver, > >>> > >>> On 12/19/25 4:51 PM, oliver Fendt wrote: > >>>> [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why > >>>> this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification > >>>> ] > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> I recently did a license analysis of u-boot an I came across some > >>>> unclear license information in files. I do not know whether this is > >>>> the right place to put my points, nevertheless I want to share my > >>>> findings. > >>>> 1. the file https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/? > >>>> url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fu-boot%2Fu- > >>>> boot%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fdrivers%2Fmmc%2Fsdhci- > >>>> > >> > cadence6.c&data=05%7C02%7Cquentin.schulz%40cherry.de%7Cc65d5ed72 > >> ac94f > >>>> > >> > 3ad7b908de4ecd611c%7C5e0e1b5221b54e7b83bb514ec460677e%7C0%7 > >> C0%7C63903 > >>>> > >> > 4841193276491%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRy > >> dWUsIlYiOiI > >>>> > >> > wLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C > >> 0%7C% > >>>> > >> > 7C%7C&sdata=qKgOGalLMURaimcVrCtxVnwN0EEldwTGB1I15M7RdsU%3D& > >> reserved=0 > >>>> contains the following information SPDX-License-Identifier: > >>>> GPL-2.0-or-platform_driver which is not a valid license identifier, > >>>> I think GPL-2.0-or-later is meant here. > >>>> > >>> > >>> +Cc @Kuan Lim Lee, @Alex Soo, @Wei Liang Lim who contributed the > >>> +driver, > >>> they should be able to answer what the intended license was (I > >>> assume the same as you). > >>> > >> > >> Mails are bouncing. > >> > >> +Cc @Hal Feng, @Minda Chen from the same company. > > > > It's OK to change the license to > > > > SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > > > > Keep the same license as drivers/mmc/sdhci-cadence.h which was added > > in the same commit fe11aa0b8ca3. > > > > Best regards, > > Hal
