On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 10:12:36AM -0300, Mateus Lima wrote: >On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 11:13 PM Peng Fan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 11:23:01AM -0300, Mateus Lima Alves wrote: >> >This patch adds CPLD support via IFC to the ls1021a-iot board. >> > >> >Signed-off-by: Mateus Lima Alves <[email protected]> >> >> CI report build failure. >> >> CC drivers/video/hitachi-tx10d07vm0baa.o >> In file included from drivers/misc/fsl_ifc.c:8: >> include/fsl_ifc.h:16:10: fatal error: asm/ppc.h: No such file or directory >> 16 | #include <asm/ppc.h> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> compilation terminated. >> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:271: drivers/misc/fsl_ifc.o] Error 1 >> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:492: drivers/misc] Error 2 >> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> CC drivers/rtc/ht1380.o >> CC drivers/video/hitachi_tx18d42vm_lcd.o >> CC drivers/rtc/i2c_rtc_emul.o >> >> make[1]: *** [Makefile:2191: drivers] Error 2 >> make: *** [Makefile:362: __build_one_by_one] Error 2 >> Cleaning up project directory and file based variables >> >> Regards >> Peng >> >Hi Peng, > >Thank you for the test, and apologies for not having validated the patch on >other targets. >In fact, this driver was not being used by any target (neither ARM nor PPC) >and after this patch it became enabled again. However, PPC targets fail >when trying to include the asm/ppc.h header, which is not available for >some reason. > >For now, I am thinking of submitting a v3 of the patch adding an explicit >dependency on ARM, something like: > >+ depends on ARM > >This way we would avoid building the driver for PPC targets. >What do you think about this approach?
It should be ok. Thanks, Peng > >Thanks again for the report and the feedback. > >BR, >Mateus
