On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 at 06:35, Martin Schwan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Add a simple unit test for testing the RAUC bootmethod. Provide only the > very basic tests for now, running a scan and list, to verify correct > detection of the RAUC bootmethod. More advanced boot tests of this > bootmethod can be added in a separate patch. > > This requires another mmc image (mmc9) to contain the following > partitions: > > 1. boot A: contains a dummy boot.scr > 2. root A: contains an empty root filesystem > 3. boot B: contains a dummy boot.scr > 4. root B: contains an empty root filesystem > > The bootmeth_rauc scans all four partitions for existence and expects a > boot script in each boot partition. > > Also add BOOTMETH_RAUC as a dependency on sandbox so that we can test > this with: > > $ ./test/py/test.py -B sandbox --build -k test_ut # build the mmc9.img > $ ./test/py/test.py -B sandbox --build -k bootflow_rauc > > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwan <[email protected]> > --- > Changes in v3: > - Use ext4 filesystem for rootfs instead of fat32 > - Explicitly create an empty directory for the root filesystem, instead > of passing "None". This fixes a usage error when calling "mcopy". > - Rebase onto current master > - Link to v2: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > > Changes in v2: > - Use mk_fs() instead of calling fallocate/mkfs/mcopy individually for > the boot and root partitions in mmc9.img > - Link to v1: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] > --- > arch/sandbox/dts/test.dts | 8 +++++++ > configs/sandbox_defconfig | 1 + > test/boot/bootflow.c | 57 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > test/py/tests/test_ut.py | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> Thanks for doing this.
