Hi Heiko, On 07/15/2011 10:13 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > sreekumar.sivaku...@wipro.com wrote: > > Actually nobody used it on arm > >> 2) If NO, Is there a branch or patch I can pickup which will have ARM >> POST tests for cache and cpu? > > Try this patches (I actually worked on getting POST tests running > on an davinci based board): > > - get CONFIG_POST working for arm boards: > [PATCH] post, memorytest: fix if vstart is not = 0x0 > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98127/ > [PATCH v2] post, memorytest: add support for none powerpc archs > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98522/ > [PATCH] post, memory test: add memory_post_test() to include file > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98126/ > [PATCH 1/2] arm, lib/board.c: Coding Style cleanup > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98532/ > update: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104755/ > [PATCH 2/2] arm, lib/board.c: use gd->ram_size instead of bd->bi_memsize > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98531/ >
I am currently working on POST tests support for keymile boards, especially km_kirkwood (km_arm) boards. I have taken your above patches (I had noticed them before) and I have POST tests running on km_arm. For the tests that take place after relocation of code, there is no problem, they work fine. With the memory test, that takes place before the relocation, it is extremly slow (even if I reduce the size of the memory tested to a very small portion). Is it something you have noticed as well ? Thank you Valentin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
