Hi Jason, On Friday 29 July 2011 06:21 PM, Jason Liu wrote: > Hi, All, > > 2011/7/29 Wolfgang Denk<w...@denx.de>: >> Dear Aneesh, >> >> In message<4e3161ed.5030...@keymile.com> Holger Brunck wrote: >>> >>> today I did a rebase of my development branch to current u-boot master. And >>> I >>> saw on our km_kirkwood board that our egiga0 interface isn't working >>> anymore. >>> >>> The CPU is a: >>> SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0 >>> >>> After bisecting the current tree I got: >>> >>> c2dd0d45540397704de9b13287417d21049d34c6 is the first bad commit >>> commit c2dd0d45540397704de9b13287417d21049d34c6 >>> Author: Aneesh V<ane...@ti.com> >>> Date: Thu Jun 16 23:30:49 2011 +0000 >>> >>> armv7: integrate cache maintenance support >>> >>> And indeed after reverting this commit on current HEAD my board is usable >>> again. >> >> The same is true for iMX27 (and probably other boards / SoCs): >> >> I verified for both the "imx27lite" and "magnesium" boards that above >> patch breaks Ethernet on these iMX27 boards. >> >> Seems we have a bigger problem here... > > The root cause is that: This commit enable d-cache for all the ARM > platform silently, > Not just ARMV7. > > --- a/arch/arm/lib/board.c > +++ b/arch/arm/lib/board.c > @@ -450,6 +450,12 @@ void board_init_r (gd_t *id, ulong dest_addr) > gd->flags |= GD_FLG_RELOC; /* tell others: relocation done */ > > monitor_flash_len = _end_ofs; > + /* > + * Enable D$: > + * I$, if needed, must be already enabled in start.S > + */ > + dcache_enable(); > +
The rationale for doing that is explained in the following thread: http://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=131107645915931&w=2 The idea was to enable it immediately after relocation. But I agree that the patch title probably doesn't indicate this. best regards, Aneesh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot