Dear Scott Wood, In message <4e3af62b.8080...@freescale.com> you wrote: > > Again, I think "nand hwfunc" conveys little information about what it's > actually going to do, versus something like: > > => nandrbl > off
I agree with Heiko that NAND related commands should be implemented as subcommands of the "nand" command. Havong "nand <subcommand>" and "nandrbl" at the same time is not acceptable to me - that should be changed into "nand rbl". > At least "nand hwfunc type" or "nand hwfunc rbl" would be more > informative, but I question the benefit that the verbosity buys us. I agree that "hwfunc" is an unlucky name. > So now it's "nand hwfunc ctrl type rbl"? Just to avoid grepping for > U_BOOT_CMD? No. I would not like this either. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de War isn't a good life, but it's life. -- Kirk, "A Private Little War", stardate 4211.8 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot