On 08/16/2011 06:56 PM, Scott Wood wrote: <snip> >>> How about a patch that was sent, that at the time didn't depend on >>> another series, but after review and changes, now depends on those >>> changes? >> Then you have to note it in the version history that it now depends on >> another patch - don't forget to also note it in the normal merge message. > > Merge message? If you mean the commit message (above the "---"), why? > It should not be committed before its dependencies. Sorry meant commit message. True - so just note it in the version history and - for convenience - in the cover letter?
Regards Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
