Dear Kumar Gala, In message <3aa0e5b6-7e38-4cb0-94e2-f7bba9a10...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > We get a bunch of warnings like this with gcc-4.6.x: > > e1000.c:4334:3: warning: variable 'x' set but not used > [-Wunused-but-set-variable] > > Are we get with adding -Wunused-but-set-variable so they don't show up?
If the variable is not used, why don't we remove it, then? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de C makes it easy for you to shoot yourself in the foot. C++ makes that harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg. -- Bjarne Stroustrup _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot