Hi Simon, On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Graeme, > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Graeme Russ <graeme.r...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> On 27/08/11 10:25, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi Mike, >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>> On Thursday, August 25, 2011 23:32:38 Simon Glass wrote:
[snip] >> >> I don't consider having to set up a tftp server as a bad thing - Quite the >> opposite really. There is plenty of network code in U-Boot that will >> benefit from testing under the sandbox target because it is much easier to >> debug. And there will be minimal impact on U-Boot code (just a sandbox >> 'Ethernet' driver is all that will be needed) >> >> I am reminded of when the R&D department that developed to eNET board were >> doing the firmware development before the first prototypes were available - >> The created a HAL which used pcap from memory. I wasn't part of that team, >> so I really don't know the details... > > Yes, sounds good, will put you down for the network testing part :-) Arghh - Rope, meet neck. Neck, meet rope ;) > > I will work on a basic patch set and try to get it to the list early next > week. > Sounds good Regards, Graeme _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot