On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 08:06:43 AM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Marek, > > > This one can be fixed with such a patch, though I dunno if it's worth it. > > > > diff --git a/include/configs/armadillo.h b/include/configs/armadillo.h > > [...] > > I have seen the rest of the discussion already, and will apply the > armadillo removal patch. I just want to make a quick note (again) to all:
Yes, it seems the person maintaining Armadillo doesn't respond. Even worse, that mailbox is long abandoned. > > Please avoid copy-pasting a patch or even part of a patch in your > replies to an official patch, because patchwork then believes you have > actually posted a new patch and created a new entry, "hijacking" the > comments for the original one. Ah damn, ok. > > The 'armadillo' patch shows the issue: > > <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/111747/> is the actual patch which > should have had the comments, but these were 'hijacked' and stored under > <http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/111800/> which is actually not a > patch but one of the replies. > > Amicalement, Cheers _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot