On 09/12/11 17:10, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Monday, September 12, 2011 04:04:39 PM Holger Brunck wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 09/12/2011 03:54 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: >>> On 09/12/2011 03:36 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>> Have you checked that the removed boards are not supported in U-Boot? >>>> >>>> No, but then the respective maintainers will get a warning and will be >>>> forced to fix their boards in both linux and uboot. >>> >>> Maybe the simplest way to catch these boards (if any) is to run MAKEALL >>> on arm targets with your mach-types file. If no board is broken, we have >>> not to worry about. >> >> sorry, I didn't follow the whole discussion, but this patch will remove the >> mach type for our km_kirkwood board. >> >> -#define MACH_TYPE_KM_KIRKWOOD 2255 >> >> This board is supported in u-boot but not mainlined in linux. So how should >> we handle this? > > #define MACH_TYPE... in your board config file until you get that > mainline
So, Marek, Albert, Is this our official solution to the mach_types cleanup by Russell? Or should we use the way discussed in thread [1], as already agreed by Albert and Wolfgang? [1] - http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-May/092218.html -- Regards, Igor. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
