> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Philip Balister <phi...@balister.org> > wrote: > > On 09/11/2011 12:38 PM, Philip Balister wrote: > >> I see I should have copied a maintainer on this patch. Which tree will > >> this sort of path go upstream via? It seems like my choices are ARM of > >> OMAP3. > >> > >> I've got a number of other patches that should go upstream that are > >> Overo centric. In general, what route should they take upstream? > > > > Ping? Any tips for getting patched committed would be helpful, I'm sure > > I'm doing something wrong. > > Sandeep, is this a patch you can pull into either u-boot-ti/master or > u-boot-ti/next? I believe it is just a bug fix and might be suitable > to pull into the existing -rcX. >
u-boot-ti/next _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
