On Monday, September 26, 2011 14:29:24 Marek Vasut wrote: > On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:03:45 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > i think gcc-3.x has been broken for a while but no one has noticed > > > > > > I guess we should go the kernel way -- make it 4.2 and be done with it. > > > > You are off by one major version. The kernel README says: > > Make sure you have at least gcc 3.2 available. > > > > Note that this will NOT build any half-way recent U-Boot version. > > It might have been my imagination then ... but 4.2 sounded quite logical to > me, sorry for confusion. > > Anyway, is there still anyone using 3.x ? If there isn't any such users, we > should simply discard it, add gcc version check and set the lower bound to > some not-too-buggy version of gcc4.
we had someone post a fix for using gcc-3.x in current master -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
