On Thursday, October 06, 2011 05:54:17 PM Scott Wood wrote: > On 10/05/2011 07:13 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Introduce CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE to avoid compiling the CPU > > support library. This can be useful on some setups. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> > > Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> > > Cc: Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> > > Cc: Detlev Zundel <d...@denx.de> > > Cc: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > > --- > > > > spl/Makefile | 5 +++++ > > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/spl/Makefile b/spl/Makefile > > index 91dd11a..fc9360f 100644 > > --- a/spl/Makefile > > +++ b/spl/Makefile > > @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@ > > > > CONFIG_SPL_BUILD := y > > export CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > > > > +# In case we want to avoid the CPU support code, we need to define this: > > +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE > > +export CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE > > +endif > > Why do we need this here, but not for other config symbols that > subordinate makefiles use (e.g. in the normal, non-SPL case)? > > Shouldn't the cpu makefile include config.mk, which includes > autoconf.mk, which defines this symbol? > > -Scott
Right, you can ignore this patch and apply only 2/2. Cheers _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
