On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:33:59 PM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Marek, > > Le 06/10/2011 02:13, Marek Vasut a écrit : > > This allows the SPL to avoid compiling in the CPU support code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut<marek.va...@gmail.com> > > Cc: Stefano Babic<sba...@denx.de> > > Cc: Wolfgang Denk<w...@denx.de> > > Cc: Detlev Zundel<d...@denx.de> > > Cc: Scott Wood<scottw...@freescale.com> > > --- > > > > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile | 7 +++++++ > > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile > > b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile index 930e0d1..3f9b0f1 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/Makefile > > @@ -28,6 +28,13 @@ LIB = $(obj)lib$(CPU).o > > > > START = start.o > > COBJS = cpu.o > > > > +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > > +ifdef CONFIG_SPL_NO_CPU_SUPPORT_CODE > > +START := > > +COBJS := > > +endif > > +endif > > + > > > > SRCS := $(START:.o=.S) $(SOBJS:.o=.S) $(COBJS:.o=.c) > > OBJS := $(addprefix $(obj),$(COBJS) $(SOBJS)) > > START := $(addprefix $(obj),$(START)) > > cpu.c basically contains one cache management function and one > linux-boot-related function probably better suited in bootm... Rather > than adding a config option to avoid compiling cpu.c, should we not > simply move the functions where they belong?
I expect the cache management functions to be moved with the ARM926 cache stuff by Hong ... though there is not much activity recently :-( > > Amicalement, _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
