> -----Original Message----- > From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com] > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 6:43 PM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm/km: adapt bootcounter evaluation > > Hi Prafulla, > > On 09/14/2011 10:41 AM, Holger Brunck wrote: > > The bootcounter (stored in the RAM) is not enough protected > with the 4 Bytes > > BOOTCOUNT_MAGIC against bit errors due to short power loss or > holding a system > > in RESET. It has been seen, that the bootcounter value has > been changed due to > > a bit flip on a system holding in RESET, but the > BOOTCOUNT_MAGIC was still valid. > > > > A bit pattern with 4000 bytes (after BOOTCOUNT_MAGIC) has > been implemented, > > which should be enough to detect a bit error. > > > > Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com> > > Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp > <valentin.longch...@keymile.com> > > cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com> > > --- > > board/keymile/km_arm/km_arm.c | 32 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > ...ping... > > Or should this serie not go through your tree? If so then > please let me know.
Generally not, this was done earlier by Wolfgang or Albert. So I was assuming someone will pull. Hi Wolfgang, Please flag if I need to pull them. Regards.. Prafulla . . . > > Same question for these two patches: > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011- > September/102534.html > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011- > September/102535.html > > Best regards > Holger _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot