On 06/12/2011 18:53, Simon Schwarz wrote:

> Hmm. This is from the former nand_spl.

Yes, I know. Until the load address does not conflict with the fix
offset, we have never seen this problem.

> Why not use malloc for this?

Of course, malloc - I want only to get rid of such hardcoded values ;-)

> Thanks to changes in the FAT driver we now
> have it in the SPL.
> 
> I don't see a reason to have this in SRAM when SDRAM is available.

No reason at all, of course.

Stefano

-- 
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: off...@denx.de
=====================================================================
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to