Dear Tom Rini, In message <ca+m6bxnuzw0specbhbiz+wspz1sthkkogkg4hbdq-3n_jnm...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > I've taken these, but I think it's time for a V9 given your suggestion > we should switch to malloc in the last part.
No, please don't. Keep the SPL leam and without critically big overhead on all kinds of resources as introduced by malloc(). Consider all all patches that add malloc() calls to SPL as pre-NAKed. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de I think it's a new feature. Don't tell anyone it was an accident. :-) -- Larry Wall on s/foo/bar/eieio in <10...@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
