Hi Mike, On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Monday 21 November 2011 18:57:59 Simon Glass wrote: >> --- a/board/reloc.c >> +++ b/board/reloc.c >> >> -void relocate_code(ulong dest_addr_sp, gd_t *new_gd, ulong dest_addr) >> +void new_relocate_code(ulong dest_addr_sp, gd_t *new_gd, ulong dest_addr) > > shouldn't this be squashed into the patch that added this func ?
Yes I'm going with the weak function idea. We can remove it when all archs are moved over. > >> --- a/nand_spl/board/freescale/mx31pdk/Makefile >> +++ b/nand_spl/board/freescale/mx31pdk/Makefile >> >> +$(obj)%.o: $(SRCTREE)/board/%.c >> + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< >> + >> +$(obj)%.o: $(SRCTREE)/arch/arm/lib/%.S >> + $(CC) $(AFLAGS) -c -o $@ $< > > ugh. is this the SOP for SPL or something ? this is awful :(. Yes, SPL. It makes me very sad too. The worse alternative is to break all boards that don't use the new SPL framework. Regards, Simon > -mike _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot