Hi, On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Tom Rini <tom.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Christian Riesch > <christian.rie...@omicron.at> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Friday, December 9, 2011, Christian Riesch < christian.rie...@omicron.at> >> wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch <christian.rie...@omicron.at> >>> Cc: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> >>> Cc: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paul...@ti.com> >>> Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> >>> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar....@ti.com> >>> --- >>> board/davinci/da8xxevm/da850evm.c | 4 +- >>> board/davinci/da8xxevm/u-boot-spl.lds | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> doc/README.davinci | 9 +++ >>> include/configs/da850evm.h | 87 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 4 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 board/davinci/da8xxevm/u-boot-spl.lds >> >> Thanks for merging this into ti/next, Tom! >> >> I'd like to submit a similar patch for the da850_am18xxevm board. Before >> commit 06194b6b65f701a9d6ef2d9b4123c4afe57d8783 both the da850evm and the >> da850_am18xxevm used the same configuration, and the differences introduced >> in the commit are rather small. Should I submit a patch that adds the same >> SPL configuration to the am18xx board config? Or should we create a header >> file that contains the common parts and include it in both da850evm.h and >> da850_am18xxevm.h? Or shall we use the Options column in boards.cfg? > > I'd like it if you submitted a patch for both boards. On my TODO list > is seeing about cleaning up some of the config files for non-omap4/5 > (which have a common.h file they start with) in 2012.03.
Ok, I'll try to provide a patch for da850_am18xxevm.h, but currently I can't get it running: I applied the changes that I did in include/configs/da850evm.h before to da850_am18xxevm.h as well. I expected this to work on my board since the board I used to test the SPI flash SPL patchset for the da850evm was actually an AM1808 experimenter's kit. Now my SPL reports: SF: Unsupported manufacturer 20 failed. Manufacturer 0x20 seems to be ST and the main difference between da850evm.h and da850_am18xxevm.h is the missing #define CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO in da850_am18xxevm.h. So my question is: Which boards are supported by da850_am18xxevm.h? I thought that I probably have an old revision of the board, but I couldn't find anything regarding SPI flash in LogicPD's PCNs. Thanks for your help! Christian
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot