Dear Che-Liang Chiou,
In message <1323852504-19954-2-git-send-email-clch...@chromium.org> you wrote:
> The new name is more aligned with Linux kernel's naming of TPM driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <peter.hu...@infineon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Che-Liang Chiou <clch...@chromium.org>
> Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org>
> ---
> Changes in v1:
> - Update s-o-b Peter Huewe's email address
>
> Makefile | 2 +-
> README | 5 ++++-
> drivers/tpm/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/tpm/{generic_lpc_tpm.c => tpm_tis_lpc.c} | 0
> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> rename drivers/tpm/{generic_lpc_tpm.c => tpm_tis_lpc.c} (100%)
Does such a change actually make sense?
Should we not rather remove all this dead code again?
Until today there are no users for this code in mainline, and no
patches have been submitted that intend to use it.
I think we should scrap this in the next release.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
