On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote: > On 16/12/2011 16:45, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> > > Hi Tom, > >> I'm going to mark this series as RFC in patchwork as I see you did >> +#ifneq... in some Makefiles and I know you know better :) That said, >> can you confirm MAKEALL -s omap3 -s omap4 -s omap5 works? > > there is a missing include in this patchset (fixed in next version), but > I can compile all. > >> omap4/5 has >> smaller size requirements than omap3(ish) stuff and I don't have 100% >> faith in linker magic to make sure the cache stuff added to SPL in >> arch/arm/lib/ isn't going to bloat up the omap4/5 stuff slightly. > > > Checking MLO without and with this patchset for an OMAP4 board (panda), > I get: > > without patchset (u-boot-ti): 33012 bytes > with the patchset (SPL_OS not enabled): 33424 > > I cannot test it, but is seems still in order, right ?
Yes, when it's too large it fails to link. Thanks! -- Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot