Hi Wolfgang, On 03/01/12 19:12, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Simon Glass, > > In message > <CAPnjgZ2jS8kzCt06LbYnXSyEKm6ck8apm=p1yqqdtnz0+q9...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: >> >> Well let's see how we go with the incremental approach - hopefully we >> can get the same result with less pain and risk, and not too much >> work. > > Did you miss my proposal not to change the existing coe for all > boards, but to provide anew implementation and convert boards one by > one? What do you think about such an approach?
My idea was to migrate each arch to the 'pure processing loops' implementation I have just posted for x86. We can then factor out the processing loop code into common code leaving just the init function arrays in arch/foo/lib/board.c We can then look at how to deal with the disparate init sequences - I'm going to have a look at my new 'initcall' proposal to see if that is viable - If so, we auto generate init_sequence.c Regards, Graeme _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
