Am Donnerstag, den 12.01.2012, 11:53 +0100 schrieb Michal Simek: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Stephan Linz, > > > > >> But what would be the best implementation for unspecified targets here? > > > > The question is actually a very simple one here: is there any board > > configuration in mainline that will actually compile and link against > > this driver? If yes, then everything is fine. If not, we would not > > even know if there were gross syntax errors in that code, and we would > > never notce when changes to other parts break compatibility with it. > > > > This is why I will not add any code that is not used in mainline - > > out-of-tree users don't help a bit. > > OK. Stephan, please send v8 with suggested changes with all patches or link > to patches which are necessary > to use. > Please also define fake address XILINX_LLTEMAC_BASEADDR in xparameters.h to > be compiled. > The same we will do for axi emac driver. > > Stephan if you like I can add that changes to my custodian git tree and do > final testing > before we ask Wolfgang to merge.
I can release the v8 patch next week. I will do some tests on weekend before I post the results here on list. The next release will be prepared to support more than one TEMAC cores (LL_TEMAC0 nad LL_TEMAC1). So I need a little bit more time to test .... -- Best regards, Stephan Linz ______________________________________________________________________________ MB-Ref: http://www.li-pro.de/xilinx_mb:mbref:start OpenDCC: http://www.li-pro.net/opendcc.phtml PC/M: http://www.li-pro.net/pcm.phtml Sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/users/slz Gitorious: https://gitorious.org/~slz _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot