On 01/17/2012 06:27 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 01/17/2012 04:19 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson<eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com>
+/* ECSPI registers */
+struct cspi_regs {
+       u32 rxdata;
+       u32 txdata;
+       u32 ctrl;
+       u32 cfg;
+       u32 intr;
+       u32 dma;
+       u32 stat;
+       u32 period;
+};

Sigh ... it's no fun I can have only one remark :-)

Is this part common for all imx-es ?

All i.MX6's

This is a cut&  paste from MX51.

I was tempted to introduce an 'mxc_ecspi.h' to merge the declaration
for i.MX5x and i.MX6 which share the ECSPI peripheral and 'mxc_cspi.h'
for i.MX31 and i.MX35 that share the CSPI peripheral.

But you don't even need this outside of the spi driver so just put it into the
spi driver and be done with it. That'll solve your duplication issue.

M


I'll defer to Stefano on this one, since I did this in response
to his request:

Right - and we already discussed in the past how to avoid to put
specific SOC code inside the driver. In fact, the cspi_regs structure
was already moved into the specific SOC header (imx-regs.h) - but the
definitions of the single bits of the registers are still inside the
driver, as well as the base address of the (e)cspi controllers.

They should also be moved - take into acoount by implementing your
changes for i.mx6

The struct cspi_regs is already present in mx31, mx35, and mx51 headers,
so I'm not breaking new ground here, only in the bitfield declarations.

        
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx31/imx-regs.h;h=6a517ddd931ca0d1e598bd7456c4c611741602eb;hb=HEAD#l60
        
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/imx-regs.h;h=df74508a93ee87ae986f7c2f48f6c5fb36626070;hb=HEAD#l279
        
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx5/imx-regs.h;h=0ee88d25b7800ae9e6aed809d02dd19d9cac9c82;hb=HEAD#l423

My interpretation of Stefano's intent is to clean up the driver at the expense
of extra defines in the arch-specific headers.

Regards,


Eric
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to