On Tuesday 21 February 2012 00:37:16 Simon Glass wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 February 2012 01:26:10 Simon Glass wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > On Monday 23 January 2012 00:30:32 Simon Glass wrote: > >> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > > > On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:46 Simon Glass wrote: > >> > > >> +#define CONFIG_LMB > >> > > > > >> > > > do we need this ? > >> > > > >> > > Without it I think bootm fails to build with FDT enabled. > >> > > >> > looks like CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT hard depends on CONFIG_LMB, and a lot of > >> > lmb stuff > >> > leaks when it isn't defined. i think i'll send a patch to tighten up > >> > the lmb.h > >> > header when that define isn't available. > >> > -mike > >> > >> OK - did you do this? Just wondering if I should drop this CONFIG now... > > > > i posted a patch, but we'll still need the lmb define > > OK. So this patch stays as is?
correct ... i responded to your v4 that i merged this as is -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
