On Tuesday 06 March 2012 10:03:19 Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:04:41PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 05 March 2012 20:46:40 Graeme Russ wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Monday 05 March 2012 19:15:54 Marek Vasut wrote: > > > >> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for your patch, it's on it's way to application :) > > > > > > > > generally the maintainer who is picking up the patch and sending on > > > > to wolfgang would add a s-o-b rather than a-b tag ... > > > > > > I've always seen s-o-b as 'I contributed to this patch' and a-b as 'I > > > think this patch looks good (and I may have even compiled it)' and t-b > > > as 'I actually ran this on real hardware' > > > > the Linux kernel wisdom is "s-o-b means 'i handled this patch in transit > > to merge'" while "a-b means 'looks good to me'" > > But didn't we have this discussion a few months ago and the answer was > that U-Boot isn't the kernel and custodians don't S-O-B every patch they > add, just A-B/T-B (and then it's at their discretion).
could be and i just missed it. personally, i don't see the point in diverging from the workflow that the kernel pioneered and u-boot just picked up, but whatever. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot