On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:29:15PM -0700, Tom Warren wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Rini [mailto:tom.r...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tom Rini > > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 1:53 PM > > To: Stephen Warren; Wolfgang Denk > > Cc: Simon Schwarz; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Warren > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] arm: fix bootm with device tree > > > > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 02:42:26PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > On 04/19/2012 03:30 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On 04/19/2012 02:09 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > >> From: Stephen Warren<swar...@nvidia.com> > > > >> > > > >> Commit 0a672d4 "arm: Add Prep subcommand support to bootm" > > > >> re-organized > > > >> do_bootm_linux() for ARM. During the re-organization, the code to > > > >> pass the device tree to the kernel was removed. Add it back. This > > > >> restores the ability to boot a kernel using device tree. > > > >> > > > >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren<swar...@nvidia.com> > > > > > > > > Acked-by: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> > > > > > > Who's going to take this patch through their tree? Is it Albert or > > > Wolfgang directly, or should I ask Tom Warren to do it through the > > > Tegra tree? > > > > I would suggest Wolfgang directly. > > I have it in my u-boot-tegra/next branch on denx right now, just so I can > test kernel boot. > It's arch/arm/lib/bootm.c, though, so shouldn't it go thru Albert's tree?
It's a relatively obvious fix (since it restores code that was removed by accident). And since Wolfgang wants to release tomorrow, I think it's reasonable to just have this go in, unless Albert snags this and sends off a PR right away. :) -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot