On Thursday 26 April 2012 10:40:51 Tom Rini wrote: > On 04/25/2012 03:28 PM, Charles Manning wrote: > > On Thursday 26 April 2012 10:21:37 Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 09:08:42AM +1200, Charles Manning wrote: > >>> On Tuesday 24 April 2012 08:58:09 you wrote: > >>>> Dear Charles Manning, > >>>> > >>>> In message<201204231346.32195.mannin...@actrix.gen.nz> you wrote: > >>>>> I recently sent a message to the list announcing a method for > >>>>> patching in the latest yaffs2. > >>>>> > >>>>> u-boot updated with the latest yaffs2 can be pulled from > >>>>> g...@github.com:cdhmanning/u-boot-yaffs2.git > >>>> > >>>> Please read http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/Patches and post proper > >>>> patch(es) for review. > >>> > >>> At least one of the files exceeds the 100k patch limit. > >>> > >>> I know you'd like patches, but there are two really easy options for > >>> someone on the inside to do this: > >>> > >>> 1) Run the script off the yaffs git > >>> -or- > >>> 2) Merge from the https://github.com/cdhmanning/u-boot-yaffs2 > >> > >> So this means things have gotten really far out of sync. Would you be > >> willing to say that in the future you'll be submitting regular well > >> formatted and broken down patches like I assume you do in the yaffs2 > >> tree itself so we can avoid this in the future? > > > > yaffs went through a large reformat a while ago meaning that the current > > code does not diff well against the old code. Future changes shuld be a > > lot easier to handle with direct patching. > > > > yaffs changes typically don't go through the yaffs list since people > > with direct git checkin access do 95-99% of the changes. > > Right, but a proper set of individual patches could be posted and > reviewed in the future, yes?
That makes sense to me. -- Charles _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot