Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote on 2012/05/03 15:11:33: > > Dear Joakim, > > In message > <of35057017.5788f889-onc12579f3.00427b35-c12579f3.00442...@transmode.se> you > wrote: > > > > I found the problem, u-boot is somewhat flawed, it requires > > CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE > > to be "base 2 even", must land on a 256K or 512K or 1024K address. I had > > This is not a generic U-Boot problem, just one oif the 85xx > implementation. > > > On a related matter, I believe that one should be able to have a minimal > > emulator > > config that allows you to both program flash efficiently and debug u-boot > > via BDI/gdb. > > I have always managed to do this before with our earlier freescale CPUs but > > now > > seems hard(impossible?) with the current u-boot design. It is a major > > pain to change emul config each time you do the burn flash/debug cycle. > > I agree with you - but again, this is "only" a 85xx issue, not a > generic U-Boot design problem.
Yes, should have been more specific. Jocke _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
