Am Freitag 11 Mai 2012, 23:16:02 schrieb Wolfgang Denk: > Dear Michael Walle, > > In message <201205112301.50311.mich...@walle.cc> you wrote: > > > Eventually this should be made configurable? > > > > Given the above, i would keep it non-configurable if youre fine with > > that. > > Only if the code size for the existing boards that don't need this > does not grow. Well i can't add a new function without increasing the filesize, can i?
Using inline functions would be one option, but that would be inconsistend with the eth_getenv_enetaddr_by_index(). phew, i wonder how the eth_getenv_enetaddr_by_index() made it into uboot ;) -- michael _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
