* Tom Warren wrote: > Thierry, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thierry Reding [mailto:thierry.red...@avionic-design.de] > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 11:00 AM > > To: Stephen Warren > > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Tom Warren; Simon Glass > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] tegra: Allow boards to perform early GPIO setup > > > > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > > > * Thierry Reding wrote: > > > Furthermore I'll need to rebase the patches onto the Tegra branch due > > > to the major restructuring of the configuration files. > > > > This isn't true. But I'll still have to respin because of the MAINTAINERS > > entry and the other points that you brought up, so let me know if I should > > add a patch for Seaboard. > When you respin this, make sure to base it on current u-boot-tegra/master, > and change any CONFIG_TEGRA2_MMC or _SPI references to CONFIG_TEGRA_MMC & > _SPI (see my changes to rename tegra periph drivers for the upcoming Tegra3 > rearch).
I saw that you already carry a patch in your next branch that does the renames in the tec.h configuration. Can I assume that when I respin with those changes included in the patch that introduces TEC support you'll drop that hunk from your patch? Or should I rather follow up with patches based on your next branch? Thierry
pgpeUW0ETMpbb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
