Dear Marek Vasut,
In message <[email protected]> you wrote:
>
> -#define kzalloc(size, flags) calloc(size, 1)
> +#define kzalloc(size, flags) calloc(1, size)
Does this make any practical difference?
I mean, are you aware of any problem that gets fixed by this patch, or
even any kind of performance degradation?
"common/dlmalloc.src" says:
calloc(size_t unit, size_t quantity);
Returns a pointer to quantity * unit bytes, with all locations
set to zero.
Multiplication being commutative, I see zero effect in this patch?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected]
Business is like a wheelbarrow. Nothing ever happens until you start
pushing.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
