On 07/10/2012 08:00 AM, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 08:29 PM, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
>> On 07/10/2012 06:19 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2012 04:57 AM, Zhong Hongbo wrote:
>>>> @@ -89,15 +96,16 @@ static void s3c_nand_select_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>>>> int chip)
>>>> */
>>>> static void s3c_nand_hwcontrol(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd, unsigned
>>>> int ctrl)
>>>> {
>>>> + struct s3c64xx_nand *const nand = s3c_get_base_nand();
>>>
>>> Is there any benefit to declaring local variables const like this?
>>
>> I reference the nand driver of S5PXX CPU. So ...
> Sorry, I make a mistake, The S5PXX have not nand flash support. When i
> do the patch, I use the format as following：
>
> struct s3c64xx_nand *nand = s3c_get_base_nand();
>
> But when I use checkpatch.pl script to check the patch. more and more
> waring about the line, it said that you should add 'const' before nand
> variable.
Could you paste the exact output from checkpatch.pl?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
