Scott Wood wrote: >> > That patch itself is OK. But the comment is incorrect. We keep adding more >> > mac addresses to this data structure. The CRC was at the end. The offset >> > 0xCC was correct.
> Is there anything in the data structure to indicate that this growth has > happened? The version number indicates whether it's 8 addresses (v0) or more than 8 (v1). The problem is that I think I just made a math error when I calculated the number of MAC addresses that would fit in the EEPROM. I was supposed to do (0xFC - 0x72) / 6 == 31, but instead I ended up with 23, and never validated it. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
