I'm ok if you take them. I should be doing a push today, so either way works for me.
On Aug 18, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 08/13/2012 06:23 PM, Scott Wood wrote: >> On 08/13/2012 01:10 PM, Matthew McClintock wrote: >>> This change reduces the SPL size by removing the redundant syncs produced >>> by out_be32 and just replies on one final sync >>> >>> Done with: >>> >>> sed -r '/in_be32/b; s/(out_be32)\(([^,]*),\s+(.*)\)/__raw_writel(\3, \2)/g' >>> -i `git grep --name-only sdram_init nand_spl/` >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Matthew McClintock <m...@freescale.com> >>> --- >>> nand_spl/board/freescale/p1010rdb/nand_boot.c | 54 >>> ++++++++++----------- >>> nand_spl/board/freescale/p1023rds/nand_boot.c | 42 ++++++++-------- >>> nand_spl/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/nand_boot.c | 48 +++++++++--------- >>> 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-) >> >> This should come first if the other patches break without it, to >> preserve bisectability. >> >> Note that I'm going to try to convert this stuff (at least one board as >> an example, but hopefully it should be easy enough to do additional >> boards once the first is done) to the new spl Really Soon Now(tm), so it >> doesn't make much sense to fiddle around with the old stuff right now >> unless I miss the merge window. I'll incorporate these changes into the >> new-spl version. I may do that by applying these patches first, but I'd >> rather they not go via the mpc85xx tree (and please CC me on NAND patches). > > I'm not going to have this working by the end of the merge window, so > these patches can go in as is. Andy, do you want to take them or should I? > > -Scott > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot