On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 08:25:31PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/18/2012 08:21 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On 09/18/2012 05:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> > >> > >> This patch introduces function get_device(). This looks up a > >> block_dev_desc_t from an interface name (e.g. mmc) and device number > >> (e.g. 0). This function is essentially the non-partition-specific > >> prefix of get_device_and_partition(). > > > > Then shouldn't get_device_and_partition just call get_device. Perhaps > > create get_partition() and then get_device_and_partition is just a wrapper. > > > > I should read all the way through the series before replying... > > Anyway, I would squash it all unless you want to have restructuring with > current functionality and then enhancements.
IMHO, restucture and then enhancements makes the most sense since it means we can bisect a latent bug easier. So no need for a v4 to squash patches down. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot