On 03.10.2012 03:04, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Łukasz Dałek,
On 03.10.2012 02:25, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Łukasz Dałek,
On 03.10.2012 02:18, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Łukasz Dałek,
On 03.10.2012 02:06, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Lukasz Dalek,
Add support for ethernet over USB which can be used for e.g. booting
process. It works with tftp and dhcp clients code.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Dalek<luk0...@gmail.com>
---
Changes for v5:
- Surrendered #include<usb.h> with CONFIGs
board/h2200/h2200.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
boards.cfg | 1 +
include/configs/h2200.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
[...]
diff --git a/boards.cfg b/boards.cfg
index ab10938..a03a469 100644
--- a/boards.cfg
+++ b/boards.cfg
@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ pdnb3 arm ixp
pdnb3 prodriv scpu arm
ixp
pdnb3 prodrive - pdnb3:SCPU
balloon3
arm pxa
h2200 arm pxa
+h2200_usbeth arm pxa h2200
-
I told you to enable the USB ethernet by default, so why do you add
this board?
I don't understand.
We agreed to split h2200 support into two parts. First one adding
basic support for device, second one adding support for usb ethernet
for h2200.
Yes, but I fail to understand why you need TWO board entries for that.
Adding the USB ethernet support is just a feature, you don't need
additional board entry for that ... so what is the idea behind adding
it?
Because easier is to type make h2200_usbeth_config than modifiy config.
Why don't you enable the USB ethernet by default for "h2200" target then?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
I will enable. This two entries really look weird.
Ok, so we're clear there'll be one entry with ethernet enabled called "h2200",
yes?
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Yes
Łukasz Dałek
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
