On 10/09/2012 01:51:14 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:09:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/06/2012 11:59:17 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >Hi Anatolij,
> >
> >On Sat, 6 Oct 2012 11:31:03 +0200, Anatolij Gustschin
<ag...@denx.de>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Fix:
> >> yaffs_guts.c: In function 'yaffs_check_chunk_erased':
> >> yaffs_guts.c:324:6: warning: variable 'result' set but not used
> >> [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> [snip]
> >Tested-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net>
> >
> >This effectively makes VCMA9 and smdk2410 (the two boards which had
> >the yaffs warnings) build clean.
>
> It takes care of the warnings, but I still see this:
>
> Configuring for VCMA9 board...
> make: *** [u-boot] Error 139
The linaro and ELDK 4.2, 5.2 toolchains build this fine. I would
suggest grabbing one of those for ARM.
I'll give one of them a try, but is it expected that the compiler will
be able to do 64/32 division without __udivdi3? Shouldn't yaffs2 be
using lldiv() or do_div()?
-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
